Supreme Court Backs FCC's Profanity Policy

But justices decline to rule on ban's threat to First Amendment
By Nick McMaster,  Newser Staff
Posted Apr 28, 2009 12:51 PM CDT
Supreme Court Backs FCC's Profanity Policy
Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia addresses a group of law students, lawyers and faculty members at the Roger Williams University law school in Bristol, RI.   (AP Photo)

The Supreme Court ruled today that the Federal Communications Commission may fine broadcasters for even a single utterance of a curse word, Lyle Denniston writes for SCOTUSblog. In a 5-4 decision, the court ruled that the FCC’s recent switch in policy from discouraging “dirty words” to a stringent ban on “fleeting expletives” was neither “arbitrary nor capricious.”

Justice Antonin Scalia noted that strict controls were especially needed for awards shows featuring “foul-mouthed glitteratae from Hollywood.” The decision settles only one aspect of the case—the Second Circuit Court had asked the higher court to decide the ban’s First Amendment ramifications before ruling itself. The Supreme Court, however, would only settle the smaller issue: “We see no reason to abandon our usual procedures in a rush to judgment without a lower court opinion.” (Read more US Supreme Court stories.)

We use cookies. By Clicking "OK" or any content on this site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. Read more in our privacy policy.
Get the news faster.
Tap to install our app.
Install the Newser News app
in two easy steps:
1. Tap in your navigation bar.
2. Tap to Add to Home Screen.