Supreme Court Rejects Move on Assault Weapons

Justices refuse to hear case against weapons ban
By Newser Editors and Wire Services
Posted Dec 7, 2015 2:49 PM CST
Supreme Court Rejects Move on Assault Weapons
In this Tuesday, Feb. 5, 2013 photo, a shell is ejected as Frankie McRae fires an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle at his Range 37 gun club in Bunnlevel, NC.   (AP Photo/Allen Breed)

Acting in the aftermath of the San Bernardino mass shooting, the Supreme Court on Monday rejected an appeal from gun owners who challenged a Chicago suburb's ban on assault weapons. Two conservative justices said they would have heard the case and struck down the ban. The Illinois State Rifle Association, one of the plaintiffs, indicated that it would keep challenging local gun restrictions. The court, though, left in place a lower court ruling that found that local governments have leeway in deciding how to regulate firearms. The federal appeals court in Chicago had upheld the city of Highland Park's 2013 law that bans semi-automatic weapons and large-capacity magazines.

In upholding the ban, Judge Frank Easterbrook wrote for the court that there is a "substantial benefit" to the Highland Park ordinance if it makes the public feel less at risk from a mass shooting. Variations of the Bushmaster AR-15, one of the guns specifically banned by Highland Park, were used in the Newtown, Connecticut school massacre, and the theater shootings in Aurora, Colorado. The appeal filed by Dr. Arie Friedman and the Illinois State Rifle Association argues that Highland Park has violated their constitutional rights by banning some of the most popular semi-automatic guns in the United States, as well as ammunition magazines of more than 10 rounds. (More US Supreme Court stories.)

Get the news faster.
Tap to install our app.
Install the Newser News app
in two easy steps:
1. Tap in your navigation bar.
2. Tap to Add to Home Screen.