That 'War' Thing? So Passé

Battle between world powers no longer profitable
By Neal Colgrass,  Newser Staff
Posted Dec 18, 2011 4:53 PM CST
Major World Wars Becoming Obsolete: Goldstein and Pinker
General Dwight D. Eisenhower addresses US paratroopers before D-Day.   (Wikipedia)

Not to jinx anything, but massive wars between world powers are really going out of style. "These prototypical wars have become increasingly rare, and the world hasn’t seen one since the three-week invasion of Iraq in 2003," argue Joshua S. Goldstein and Steven Pinker in the New York Times. Their benchmark for a "war": 1,000 military and civilian deaths in a year of fighting between national armies.

"Today’s civil wars are closer to organized crime than traditional war" in places like Colombia or the Congo. True, "countries remain armed and hostile, so war is hardly impossible"—but why do it? Nations once reaped spoils and gained land from conquest, but that's harder with today's stricter international community. "War also declines as prosperity and trade rise," write Goldstein and Pinker. "Historically, wealth came from land and conquest was profitable. Today, wealth comes from trade, and war only hurts." (Read more army stories.)

We use cookies. By Clicking "OK" or any content on this site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. Read more in our privacy policy.
Get the news faster.
Tap to install our app.
X
Install the Newser News app
in two easy steps:
1. Tap in your navigation bar.
2. Tap to Add to Home Screen.

X