Why Sugar-Free Sweets Are a Bad Move

They won't help your waistline or your teeth
By Jane Yager,  Newser Staff
Posted Jun 14, 2010 8:41 AM CDT
Why Sugar-Free Sweets Are a Bad Move
PEEPS(R) Sugar-Free Marshmallow Hearts with "Splenda(R)".   (PRNewsFoto/Just Born, Inc.)

A growing number of Americans are turning to sugar-free cookies, soda, gum, and candy to help them lose weight. But unless you're diabetic, sugar-free sweets are probably a bad dietary move, the LA Times reports. Here are some of the reasons why:

  • In most cases, the calorie difference is negligible: While two regular Oreos have 107 calories, two fat-free Oreos have 100.

  • Some research shows that artificial sweeteners actually trick the body into craving more calories than it otherwise would.
  • Consumed in excess, artificial sweeteners can have laxative effects.
  • More seriously, refined carbs—which are just as present in sugar-free as sugared sweets—are linked to higher risks of diabetes and heart disease.
  • They won't even help you avoid cavities: Bacteria that cause tooth decay feed off carbohydrates as well as sugar.
(More artificial sweetener stories.)

Get the news faster.
Tap to install our app.
Install the Newser News app
in two easy steps:
1. Tap in your navigation bar.
2. Tap to Add to Home Screen.