1st Amendment v. Dogfight Video: High Court to Decide

Conviction rests on First Amendment status of animal abuse tapes
By Nick McMaster,  Newser Staff
Posted Apr 20, 2009 2:56 PM CDT
1st Amendment v. Dogfight Video: High Court to Decide
Los Angeles Police Chief William Bratton speaks about a 2008 dogfighting bust.   (AP Photo)

The Supreme Court agreed today to hear that pits the First Amendment against the production and sale of dogfighting videos, the Chicago Tribune reports. The case involves a man jailed for selling several brutally explicit videos of pit bulls fighting. A federal appeals court overturned his conviction on grounds that the law against dogfighting videos violated free-speech protections—which apply even to depictions of illegal activity.

The appeals court noted that exceptions exist, most notably for child pornography, whose illegality supercedes First Amendment protections. But the court was unwilling to create, in dogfighting videos, a new category of unlawful expression. The government appealed to the Supreme Court, which will hear arguments in the fall. (More dogfighting stories.)

Get the news faster.
Tap to install our app.
X
Install the Newser News app
in two easy steps:
1. Tap in your navigation bar.
2. Tap to Add to Home Screen.

X