Spam Doesn't Waste Energy, Humans Do

Study miscalculates how people use computers: Kaplan
By Ambreen Ali,  Newser Staff
Posted Apr 16, 2009 12:25 PM CDT
Spam Doesn't Waste Energy, Humans Do
If most businesses leave their computers on anyway, it doesn't waste any more energy to filter spam on them, Kaplan says.   (Shutter stock)

A recent study that equates spam’s carbon footprint to that of a whopping 2.4 million homes is fascinating, but completely wrong, Jeremy Kaplan writes in PC Magazine. The researchers traced most of the energy usage to the end user’s computer, but that energy-waster would probably be left on even if no one was manually filtering spam, he points out.

“If you had absolutely no spam in your inbox, would you turn your PC off earlier—or use the extra time you’ve saved to play more World of Warcraft?” asks Kaplan, noting that “business users leave their PCs on all day regardless of whether they’ve finished sorting their inboxes.” (Read more spam stories.)

We use cookies. By Clicking "OK" or any content on this site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. Read more in our privacy policy.
Get the news faster.
Tap to install our app.
X
Install the Newser News app
in two easy steps:
1. Tap in your navigation bar.
2. Tap to Add to Home Screen.

X