A man who spent nearly four decades behind bars for a 1983 killing won his freedom Thursday after New Orleans prosecutors joined defense lawyers in asking to have his murder conviction overturned. Attorneys on both sides said evidence of inconsistencies in the only eyewitness’s testimony was kept from the jury that convicted Raymond Flanks, per the AP. Their joint motion to vacate his conviction was approved Thursday morning by a state judge. Flanks, 59, who is identified in some court records as Raymond Flank, was convicted in the December 1983 shooting death of Martin Carnesi during an armed robbery outside the home he shared with his wife.
Carnesi’s wife had identified Flanks as the killer. But her description of the suspect and the car he used differed at trial from her earlier statements to police and a grand jury. The motion seeking to have the conviction thrown out said that Faye Carnesi, who is now deceased, had described the killer as having a white blotch on his cheek, that he was in his late 20s and that he drove an old car. "Given that Mr. Flank was 20 years old, had no white blotches on his face, and drove a new car, these were important discrepancies," the motion said. The information might have affected the jury's decision, it said.
According to the motion, Flanks had been arrested in the armed robbery of a grocery store—he was later convicted and has not contested that verdict—before he was implicated in the Carnesi death. Flanks was tried twice for the Carnesi killing. The first jury, in 1984, deadlocked even after being told the gun Flanks had when he was arrested for the grocery robbery was the murder weapon. That later turned out to be false, based on a 1985 examination of the weapon by a federal laboratory. Prosecutors tried him again later in 1985, winning a first-degree murder conviction and life sentence.
story continues below
“The parties agree that, in this case which relied on a single eyewitness, competent counsel armed with the favorable evidence would have been able to present a compelling case that Mrs. Carnesi was innocently mistaken when presented with the wrong suspect,” the motion said. The Innocence Project New Orleans, which advocated for Flanks’ release, noted that the case involved “cross-racial identification”—the eyewitness was white, the victim was Black—and said most wrongful convictions in New Orleans that involve withheld evidence involve Black defendants.
(More
Innocence Project stories.)